Kissy wrote:Misery Called Life wrote:Kissy wrote:Ruggedblond wrote:Kissy wrote:no honey without money
no attraction without attention
Agreed with the attraction/ attention. No Honey without Money ... How low principles have stooped.
well how could i live with a man who has no money or low budget!!!
if you assume it as low principles then everyone has his/her point of view and principles due to their lifestyle. you may consider it as low principles but others nop !
True......What's love without diamonds and Louis Vuitton
you just decode my phrase as your point of view
when looking for a man it is important to plan it as a long term relationship, so what his budget is that can save me and my kids, what his culture and how he trusts respects me
no woman want a poor man to starve heror you do ?
money doesnt mean as RICH no , but at least he related to the same financial standard as me becuase i used to live with a level of financial standard
Hey just kiddin
I totally get what you say.
I think the point that Rugged Blond made was that women will always fall for the wealthier man. We're not talking about starvation here. For eg take two men one a Millionaire and the other a Filght Steward. The millionaire will always have the affection of more women thanks to his bank balance.
But you've made ur stand clear. You ain't looking for the wealthiest man just someone who can keep you happy. That's how it should be Nice and Balanced!
