Dubai Forums archive (old posts) - to navigate to the current version click Dubai Forums
Dubai Expat Help Dubai Chat Dubai Romance Dubai Auto Dubai Villas to Let Dubai High Tech Dubai Guide Affordable Cars in Dubai Accommodation in Dubai Jobs in Dubai Available Professionals in Dubai Learn Arabic Philosophy Forum

Dubai Expat Forum - Dubai politics talk

Constitution of The National Liberation Front Of Tripura


shafique I understand the argument - everyone else is wrong and your in-depth research (consisting of quoting the manifesto) gives you greater insights. Hmm. So, the fact that the manifesto of this Christian Terrorist group does not mention that they are are Christian Terrorists disproves all the other references given. Hmm. I guess they are as incorrect as Father O'Conner and Hans Kung are when it comes to the insertion of false verses into the Bible. There too, you disagree with the evidence because of a pre-existing belief and not because of any evidence. The links give references to actual terrorist attacks, but you are finding comfort that the manifesto does not mention Christian terrorist ideals. So the 'Holy Army' is a-religious, is it? Hmm. Cheers, Shafique
event horizon
Let's try again. The fact that the manifesto of the NLFT does not mention establishing a 'kingdom of God and Christ" in their manifesto shows that the BBC article was wrong.

There's also the fact that the manifesto says that all creeds can join their group and their rhetoric is clearly nationalist/soft leftist. I found one mention of 'God' in their manifest but that was about the extent to religious language that was contained in their own constitution.

I agree, they carry out terror attacks just like the Maoists in Nepal and the Shining Path in S. America. What does that have to do with religious fundamentalists, again?

Was this from the same article that claimed the group's charter called for the establishment of a Christian theocracy? Inquiring minds want to know. event horizon I happened to read through the constitution/charter/manifesto of the NLFT after reading on wikipedia that 90% of this allegedly Christian fundamentalist group were Christians, as opposed to 100%.
One thing I noticed was how similar their charter was to your run of the mill leftist group operating somewhere in the sticks as opposed to what one would expect from a religious fundamentalist organization, such as HAMAS, with repeated references to the Koran, Allah and the prophet Muhammad. In this case, I would expect numerous statements about Jesus, the New Testament, God and the enforcement of a Christian theocracy but, nope. All of that is strangely missing from their charter.

also:

Well, it was close but no cigar. It sounds like the NF whatever is a(nother) nationalist/leftist leaning terrorist group more than any type of Christian fundie movement - despite the hype and wikipedia claims.
Perhaps shafique can scan through the link I posted and confirm not only the absence of any type of religious/Christian rhetoric in the article but also count the number of times 'revolutionary committee' and 'class struggle' are mentioned instead? shafique So, do you support them when they kill women and children, or will you just refuse to condemn them like you refuse to condemn Goldstein?
The point in the other thread though was that Christian Converts were carrying out terrorist acts.
There doesn't seem to be any doubt that either:
1. They are terrorists or
2. They are Christian converts or
3. One of their aims is to forcibly convert people to Christianity.
It is instructive that the link provided states that the armed wing is called a Holy Army!:

(And let's not forget that the same web site gives categoric information about the terrorist acts committed by this 'Holy Army' and states their aim)
I quoted the BBC News item which stated:

But hey, if people can venerate the Jewish Terrorist Baruch Goldstein, then it is not unusual that others will refuse to agree with statistics which show Christian Converts committed more acts of terrorism than Muslim converts did.
Count still stands at 169 (and counting) vs 1. Says it all.
But then again, I guess eh agrees with how Hamas represents itself - i.e. that it is not a terrorist organisation. No - wait, perhaps in that case we shouldn't consider what the terrorists think of themselves! ;)
Cheers,
Shafique shafique NLFT - the Christian Al Qaeda:

(Note this is an old article from 2002 - the stats now list the terrorist activities up to 2009) shafique Also, don't take my word for it - how about the US Government's classification:

#National_Liberation_Front_of_Tripura
(And the above wiki page gives the other violent Christian organisations around the world - but the quote itself is referenced on the page)
Thanks to eh for quoting what the NLFT says about itself and what the reality according to the US gov etc is.
Cheers,
Shafique event horizon As I said, there's a lot of spin on the NLFT out there. Clearly from their charter, however, (which the BBC article incorrectly claims that the charter calls for a Christian theocracy) the NLFT are your run of the mill leftist/nationalist movement with a majority of its members who happen to be Christian converts.
Unfortunately, this does not meet the requirements of religious terrorist converts since these converts are driven more by Marxism than the texts and teachings of Christianity. This is in sharp contrast to the Jihadist converts to Islam who carry out jihad operations because of the texts and teachings of Islam - they are fighting Jihad for the eventual establishment of an Islamic theocracy and are following the mainstream interpretations of Islam in doing so, by waging perpetual warfare against unbelievers, becoming martyrs when they die, etc,.
Anyways, do you have any actual examples of converts to other religions who carry out terror attacks because they are motivated by the texts and teachings of their new religion? So far, my count stands at well over one hundred dead murdered by convert jihadists and your count still stands at around zero.
By the way, I notice that you must have missed my request to find any references to religion in the NLFT's charter and, instead, count the number of leftist catch phrases. Have you finished or are you still counting out all of the times 'revolutionary councils' and 'people's struggle' is mentioned in their manifesto?
To repeat, this is from the NLFT's own manifesto:
shafique Thanks for posting the NLFT's manifesto.
The info from the US government and the Indian anti-terror group doesn't contradict the manifesto - just informs us that they are a terror group and lists their terrorist attacks, as well as their Christian credentials.
The 'Holy Army' as they call their militant wing has kidnapped civilians, as well as killed women and children - and, as posted, with the aim to convert people to Christianity and 'liberate' the state.
I haven't seen any evidence produced to say that the US government info is wrong - just an interpretation of what the manifesto does not say.
Interesting line of argument though - interpret the manifesto and ignore the terror attacks. I wonder if the same line of thought could be applied to Hamas? ;)
In the mean time, the count still stands at 169 and counting vs 1.
Cheers,
Shafique event horizon It helps to read your own links. The quote from Wikipedia was from a non-profit organization that is partly funded by the US government. So, what you quoted is not a quote from the government but from some organization that has profiles of different terrorist groups they've gleaned information off of from the internet.
I can only assume that their incorrect information of the leftist terrorist group, the NFLT, comes the same BBC article you quoted from.
Which brings me to my next point.
The BBC article says that the NFLT, according to their manifesto, seeks to create a Christian theocracy:

Unfortunately, the NLFT manifesto has been linked to and partially quoted in this thread. Nowhere does the manifesto say the NLFT seeks to establish a Christian theocracy. In fact, the words "Christ", "Christian" and "kingdom of God" are completely missing from their manifesto. One wonders how much research the BBC reporter must have done on the NLFT to fabricate such a claim.
On the flip side, if the BBC is ever hiring, you should send in a resume. Be sure to tell them that you're really good at trawling through wikipedia and Google and would like to get paid for your 'research'.
So yes, I have no problem condemning Christian terrorism - real or imagined. shafique Interesting views eh - you should write to the authorities I quoted from and tell them they are all wrong - they should have read the constitution and ignored all the other evidence they quoted. Let us know what they say. ;) Cheers, Shafique

1 Dubai Jobs .com The First Place to Find a Job in Dubai
event horizon I'm aware of the propaganda. I just don't believe it and it's why I don't agree with you. shafique Yes, you're Google search proved quite fruitful ;) . I'm not surprised you want to ignore the actual terrorist acts and the conclusions of the organisations quoted. I understand that your 'analysis' of the constitution must have been taxing - but thanks for sharing your considered opinion and this time telling us what it was based on. Cheers, Shafique event horizon Here's the BBC spin:

Here's the reality (posted from the same website you previously linked to):
I checked several times and I still have not come across where in their constitution does it call for the establishment of a Christian theocracy.
Do you want to give it a try? shafique I thought I was quite clear where I was getting my info (as you were - one Google search and a read of their constitution).
Here is a quote I gave before:

It is just one of many Christian terrorist groups listed here:
#National_Liberation_Front_of_Tripura
As I said, you are most welcome to write to these organisations and explain that they are wrong and that your in-depth analysis (well, your reading of the constitution on the web) shows they are mistaken to claim these terrorists are Christian fundies.
I have no reason to doubt 'The National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism' - especially as they seem to be funded by the US Government who normally refrain from calling many real terrorists that name. The constitution does name their military wing as 'The National Holy Army' - an interesting name for a 'secular' organisation, I think you would agree.
Do you have any other arguments other than a reading of their constitution?
The Press Trust of India also seem to be in on the 'spin' - eg see here:
&id=1060445766

Cheers
Shafique shafique Whilst I only quoted the description of the NLFT in the quote above, it is worth quoting the whole article which shows why they are indeed Christian Terrorists :

So 4 civilians killed because their relation had decided to leave the organisation. I couldn't find a reference in their constitution that said this was ok - so, should we dismiss this atrocity?
Cheers,
Shafique event horizon As I said, there is a lot of spin on the NFLT out there on the web. It would appear that the claim that this group is a Christian fundamentalist movement in which their constitution calls for the implementation of a Christian theocracy (it doesn't) stems from a poorly researched BBC article that was refuted in this thread. Unfortunately, many other sources on the internet have since repeated this made up claim from the BBC article (after doing some googling of their own) and there are now dozens of web pages that say the same thing - that the constitution of this insurgent group calls for an establishment of a religious theocracy. The same sources that have reported this media hype are the ones that shafique continues to use, including linking to a website called 'Christian aggression'. One can only wonder why shafique still expects anyone to believe the claims from websites that did not fact check any further after this point. But hey, I'm sure if I linked to a website called "Muslim aggression' that claimed Abu Bakr married his sister, shafique would still find that website a credible source. shafique
I think you mis-typed there. Surely you meant 'researched facts' instead of spin.
But hey, your research seems to be just reading their manifesto - and you seem to be arguing that the BBC's facts are therefore 'poorly researched'.
I did ask you whether your views are based on anything more than wishful ignoring of the actual terrorist acts and your interpretation of their constitution (which names their militant wing 'the National Holy Army') - but again you choose to not answer. ;)
I'll add this to the growing list of 'quaint' beliefs you have.
Cheers,
Shafique event horizon One issue at a time. Can you find where in the NLFT's charter does it call for the creation of a Christian theocracy, as per the BBC author's claim? If not, I am glad that you concede that this was media spin. shafique The charter specifies that the military wing is called 'the National Holy Army' and it is this Holy Army which has carried out the terrorist attacks listed.
Your argument seems to be based soley on reading what the charter says, rather than the evidence actually produced.
I asked before whether you had any evidence for your belief that these guys aren't Christian terrorists, other than your interpretation of their charter.
Of course, I understand you don't want to condemn terrorists who kill people who do not convert - such as this report from 2000:

Or

So, let's ignore the actual terrorist acts and the fact that these terrorists have been aided by western Christian churches and lets focus on the charter. Hmm.
I guess that a refusal to condemn Jewish terrorists is just a general symptom of a refusal to condemn any non-Muslim terrorist!?
Cheers,
Shafique
event horizon I take it that you have not found that passage in the NLFT's charter which, according to the Beeb journalist, calls for the implementation of a Christian theocracy. Strange. Almost seems the reporter made the claim up. shafique Nope, I couldn't find in the charter any reference to the terrorist acts committed by these guys listed above, just the reference to their 'National Holy Army'. I was hoping that you had more 'evidence' that all these reports are wrong - but hey, it is interesting to hear your quaint beliefs. Cheers, Shafique shafique From the same site that hosts the constitution:

(So some of the terrorists had a conscience, it seems)
And an overview from the BBC:

But given the list of terrorist acts committed since that was written, it appears to be quite under-stated.
So, we have actual analysis and actual terrorist acts - and one weak apologist's view of their constitution. Hmmm. Is that the bottom of the barrel I hear being scraped?? :)
Cheers,
Shafique event horizon
Cool. So we agree that the assertion from the BBC article was made up by the journalist and the rest of the article should not be believed.
I see that you have finally gotten around to reading your own link. Kudos to you. I'll leave it to you to distinguish terrorist attacks carried out by the secular wing and terrorist attacks carried out by the more religious branch (which I assume is the smaller of the two). shafique Another quaint belief that the BBC made up all the references about this Christian Terrorist group forcibly converting people to Christianity. I'll give you credit for self-belief. As I said, many posts ago, good luck in convincing all the terror-monitoring groups that they are wrong. Cheers, Shafique event horizon The group broke up as your link says. You'll have to figure out which attacks are carried out by the Christian fundie wing and which attacks are carried out by the secular wing. That's of course if you can confirm each attack by an independent source since we have already seen the spin against this group - that their constitution calls for the establishment of a theocracy when no such statement exists. shafique :)
What is telling is that your 'beliefs' are solely based on a reading of their constitution, but at least now you admit they are terrorists and have been killing people for not converting to Christianity.
I see that you are now imagining that there is a 'secular' wing to this terrorist organisation - which was set up with a military wing called the 'National Holy Army'. This is another quaint belief.
It is very interesting to see you construct arguments to disguise the fact that these Christian Convert Terrorists outnumber by 100 to one the number of Muslim Convert Terrorists you have managed to uncover in the same period.
When you have any new evidence, pray let us know. In the meantime, shouldn't you be trying to add to your count of one actual Muslim Convert terrorist?
Cheers,
Shafique shafique double post event horizon Why do you keep on claiming that i've only cited one Muslim terrorist convert? It certainly is a quaint belief of yours. shafique Because your count still stands at one, despite me asking you to update your count. Mine stands at an under-estimated count of 169 actual terrorists compared to your one (and that's only up to 2003, IIRC) As I said, I think you should update your count - otherwise the one numpty you've cited looks like a very sorry statistic indeed. I'll bump the thread for you. Cheers, Shafique



Dubai Forum | Paris Forum | Vegan Forum | Brisbane Forum | 3D Forum | Classified Jobs in Dubai | Listings of Jobs in London | London classified ads Portal
| © 2021 Dubai Forums | Privacy policy