Dubai Forums Dubai Discussions Dubai General Chat

XPT wrote:Wow arnie you really got problems man.

I heard you rant before about this Concord and Ian all in the tone of "I know more than you, I have powers" and on and on and on and on. I chose to ignore you and will continue to do so but I've got 20 seconds free now. Only a person who has never been on a forum fails to realize that IP addresses can be viewed - BFD. But as "rudeboy" implies that anyone can be anyone. As for me I could care less I just find it sad (well, I don't really) that you are a 2 trick pony (I am boss adn I know who you are). Take the advice you quote in your post "give it up man".

I've yet to read a post from either of them on this forum. No wonder they left.

I know you are just trying to make "friends" here with your superior knowledge. Well, good luck then.

So... I gather from your reply that you were not Concords and Ballbreaker I & II.

Arnie has been saying this for some time, and since you have not denied it (until now,) I assumed you were.

What’s going on? Who’s right and who’s wrong??

I'm curious now.....!!!!

Tom Jones wrote:

XPT wrote:Wow arnie you really got problems man.

I heard you rant before about this Concord and Ian all in the tone of "I know more than you, I have powers" and on and on and on and on. I chose to ignore you and will continue to do so but I've got 20 seconds free now. Only a person who has never been on a forum fails to realize that IP addresses can be viewed - BFD. But as "rudeboy" implies that anyone can be anyone. As for me I could care less I just find it sad (well, I don't really) that you are a 2 trick pony (I am boss adn I know who you are). Take the advice you quote in your post "give it up man".

I've yet to read a post from either of them on this forum. No wonder they left.

I know you are just trying to make "friends" here with your superior knowledge. Well, good luck then.

So... I gather from your reply that you were not Concords and Ballbreaker I & II.

Arnie has been saying this for some time, and since you have not denied it (until now,) I assumed you were.

What’s going on? Who’s right and who’s wrong??

I'm curious now.....!!!!

I have not denied in the same way that if I said "Tom Jones owes me one million dirhams" and you don't deny it does not mean you owe me the money - because I don't know who you are etc. etc.

As I stated before, this Arniegang person has some bug up his rear end about this Concord person. I got a few pms when he first made reference to it. The messages I got were in essence "Pay no mind. He has done the same before to show he has special "moderator" powers". So I ignored him and will continute to. Except you know how hard it is not to look at a car wreck - gotta look.

Expect some pm from arnie about it (unless you told him in the past what a loser he is..).

Anyway.

*waits for dumb post from arniegang*

This is getting really annoying, who cares if XPT is concord or not! (I personally think he is not concord, concord guy was funnier!)

melika969 wrote:This is getting really annoying, who cares if XPT is concord or not! (I personally think he is not concord, concord guy was funnier!)

Hey Mel

Sorry to have to correct you.

But, you cant possibly know who Concord is, he was long gone before you ever registered on DF.

OK

here's a good one, lets play spot the similarity


Recent Post:

dubai-chat/who-whom-like-t40546.html


and some older Concord/XTP posts from 2007

dubai-chat/here-who-dislike-t19678.html#p190201

dubai-chat/here-who-respect-not-mafia-rapper-way-t19677.html#p190199

dubai-chat/here-who-miss-t19676.html#p190198


If any of you are confused about XTP/Concord liking me back then, it is because we were, once upon a time very good friends.

I wasn't going to continue engaging in responding to you nonsense but may I just suggest you seek professional help for your obsession why this Concord poster. Oh dear.

I will be whoever those voices in your head tell you and I am. Matters not to me.

arniegang wrote:

melika969 wrote:This is getting really annoying, who cares if XPT is concord or not! (I personally think he is not concord, concord guy was funnier!)

Hey Mel

Sorry to have to correct you.

But, you cant possibly know who Concord is, he was long gone before you ever registered on DF.

Hey Arnie,

yeah u are right, but i have seen some of his posts. In my fights with Chocs I brought some posts of him in FC,which was asking sage his posts are being deleted in General, and it is not u nor Sage. I can't be sure who is who, this is a virtual forum!! it's not important, I just think you are making a big deal of it...

XPT wrote:

Tom Jones wrote:

XPT wrote:Wow arnie you really got problems man.

I heard you rant before about this Concord and Ian all in the tone of "I know more than you, I have powers" and on and on and on and on. I chose to ignore you and will continue to do so but I've got 20 seconds free now. Only a person who has never been on a forum fails to realize that IP addresses can be viewed - BFD. But as "rudeboy" implies that anyone can be anyone. As for me I could care less I just find it sad (well, I don't really) that you are a 2 trick pony (I am boss adn I know who you are). Take the advice you quote in your post "give it up man".

I've yet to read a post from either of them on this forum. No wonder they left.

I know you are just trying to make "friends" here with your superior knowledge. Well, good luck then.

So... I gather from your reply that you were not Concords and Ballbreaker I & II.

Arnie has been saying this for some time, and since you have not denied it (until now,) I assumed you were.

What’s going on? Who’s right and who’s wrong??

I'm curious now.....!!!!

I have not denied in the same way that if I said "Tom Jones owes me one million dirhams" and you don't deny it does not mean you owe me the money - because I don't know who you are etc. etc.

As I stated before, this Arniegang person has some bug up his rear end about this Concord person. I got a few pms when he first made reference to it. The messages I got were in essence "Pay no mind. He has done the same before to show he has special "moderator" powers". So I ignored him and will continute to. Except you know how hard it is not to look at a car wreck - gotta look.

Expect some pm from arnie about it (unless you told him in the past what a loser he is..).

Anyway.

*waits for dumb post from arniegang*

Well… I’m still not sure. You continue to beat around the bush with regards to this “Concord” character.

I understand. You really don’t have to explain anything. And I honestly don’t care. I wasn’t on this forum during Concord’s time either! But I was here when the two Ballbreakers made a brief, albeit awful, appearance!!

I don’t know what your beef is all about with Arnie. Apparently, you guys were good friends and something went wrong.

It would be great, however, if you two can work it out privately, esp. given Arnie’s health problems. Life is too short, even for those who live to a ripe old age. Ask your grandparents, and they’ll tell you!!

Nobody is perfect. We’ve all got our own faults and quirks.

So…c’mon guy…bury the hatchet...and let’s see a happy ending to this squabble!

End of sermon.

Nice post TJ

Thank you, it sums up my sentiments entirely - alas sadly i dont think it will happen though. There appears to be a level of hate that some people just cant let go of.

I will be quite frank in telling you this in that the level of hate for me is because i never agreed and spoke openly about how he used to treat and speak to Sage. I know both of them well and see both as deep rooted nice people and Sage in particular.

This is why, if you notice, all XPT does is to continually moan and critise "Mods", he is in fact refering to Sage and i.

Whether or not anyone believes otherwise about whether or not XTP is aka Concord aka Ballbreaker aka Ballbreaker2 matters not to me. I know what i know and i am comfortable with that, and i shall continue to address XTP as i see fit.

End of sermon

Although I appreciate your post and agree that life is short, it appears that you have bought into this nonsense of who-is-who and I-know-who-you are. I am not Concord and have never been Concord or whoever this Arniegang guy thinks I am.

Which brings me to the part of your quote below - in which you appear to buy into what arniegang has been obsessing about. I've never met arniegang.

Tom Jones wrote:I don’t know what your beef is all about with Arnie. Apparently, you guys were good friends and something went wrong.

Oh, now it is about "defending" Sage !!! Pleeeeeaaaaasssseeee! And I see how arniegang jumped on the band wagon in the post about service charge along with UAE Kid more

Actually one of my girlfriends and I were having a laugh about this and she said "Did it ever occur to you that this Concord may actually be arniegang?". It never occured to me until then. Who on this forum has met this alleged Concord who Arniegang claims to have been his friend?

Anyone?

XPT wrote:Although I appreciate your post and agree that life is short, it appears that you have bought into this nonsense of who-is-who and I-know-who-you are. I am not Concord and have never been Concord or whoever this Arniegang guy thinks I am.

Which brings me to the part of your quote below - in which you appear to buy into what arniegang has been obsessing about. I've never met arniegang.

Tom Jones wrote:I don’t know what your beef is all about with Arnie. Apparently, you guys were good friends and something went wrong.

Actually one of my girlfriends and I were having a laugh about this and she said "Did it ever occur to you that this Concord may actually be arniegang?". It never occured to me until then. Who on this forum has met this alleged Concord who Arniegang claims to have been his friend?

Anyone?

yea i fell out with myself

How can it be "alleged" or are you suggesting i fell out with myself, left this forum in 2008, then set up my own forum never to post on here again as Concord but, continued all throughout to post as Arniegang ?

Interesting submission


as a caveat and in answer to your public question. The only 3 active members to have met you (as you well know) are myself, sage and Chocs. Sage knows you are Concord so thats 2 out of 3.

Wow, XPT! A thread hating on you has gotten more responses than any of yours! Perhaps it is I who own this forum! (No, I'm not dumb enough to make such a claim). I will profess that listening people agree with me about how daft, ignorant and pointless your post are (notice I didn't say YOU are), leads me to think that this post OWNS this forums (for now).

Continue people...

FYI, I don't know who any of these Concord, arnie or Ballbreakers are and have had no problem with anyone. Choc is a bit of a b*tch but besides that I have no issue with anyone. Even she seems to have gone away.

Now Concord, here is another interesting fact that the relatively new members here wont know.

You joined on Sunday Nov 22th and within 2 days and 12 posts you were voting for bora as a Mod. The following 4 posts (no's 13,14, 15 + 16) were a/ about your favourite Charity K9, a charity with which you have raised funds for ice machines, new premises etc and b/ there you go again picking on Sage about his avatar, his over enthusiastic morals, censorship and his moving posts to FC (nothing new there then). Like i said change the CD please mate, i know , i know you just cant help yourself, the temptation is just too much for you.

Oh and Concs i'll let you into a little secret.A very good mutual friend of ours who moved from Arabian Ranches to Mirdiff confirmed you were posting as Ballbreaker. Thats why he told you to "let it go man" because even he knew you had gone to far.




Soooooooooooooo in reverse order..............................

POST No 16

Re: More Good news from Dubai World ...
BlackburnRovers wrote:
Let me try to put a positive spin on this; the article you posted is a fabricated one made up by people jealous of Dubai.

Even Sage would try that defense !by XPT
Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:50 am

Forum: Dubai General Chat
Topic: More Good news from Dubai World ...
Replies: 22
Views: 532 Jump to post

____________________________________________________________

POST No 15

Re: More Good news from Dubai World ...
capsicum wrote:
Vik, who cares to what Sage has to say, everybody on DF seems to agree that he has no credibility.
Dubai World is a failure, it cant pay its debts and now loses on foreclosure.

Sage has no opinion of his own he is a parrot !by XPT
Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:48 am

Forum: Dubai General Chat
Topic: More Good news from Dubai World ...
Replies: 22
Views: 532

_______________________________________________________________

POST No 14

Re: The Times Banned thread
It is censorship. I've notice that the mod Sage seems to be on a high moral horse and moves thread to Fight Club on a wim. It is his defininition of "offensive". Frankly I find it offensive that his Avatar is that of Osama Bin Laden - even if it has "mr bean's" face.by XPT Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:07 pm

Forum: Fight Club
Topic: The Times Banned thread
Replies: 32
Views: 475 Jump to post
___________________________________________________________________

POST No 13

Re: A Dog's Life in Dubai!!!!!!!
K-9 Friends is the best place for dog rescue. They do a great job. They are always looking for homes for abandoned dogs and is a great place to find a dog to give it a home. Sheik Mohammed built a facility to them because of the great work they do. DO NOT CALL DUBAI MUNICIPALITY. THEY KILL THE DOG U...by XPT
Mon Dec 07, 2009 7:53 am

Forum: Dubai General Chat
Topic: A Dog's Life in Dubai!!!!!!!
Replies: 6
Views: 293 Jump to post
___________________________________________________________________

POST No 12

re: New Mod
I vote Bora Bora for moderator.by XPT
Wed Nov 25, 2009 6:30 am

Forum: Dubai General Chat
Topic: New Mod
Replies: 34
Views:

arniegang wrote:Oh and Concs i'll let you into a little secret.A very good mutual friend of ours who moved from Arabian Ranches to Mirdiff confirmed you were posting as Ballbreaker. Thats why he told you to "let it go man" because even he knew you had gone to far.

Last post on this "topic" on my part because it is scary how obsessed you are. But sounds like you have another imaginary "friend"and as per your imagination my "friend" (well Concord's friend anyway). But you are the only once carrying on about Concord and Ballbraker (who I did not realize until a few posts back was also a poster) where is your other so called friend with this "knowledge" you claim? I asked who had met this Concord person and only you (not them) answer how Sage had met Concord. Well Sage can speak for himself I suppose and I don't thinkg I've ever read a post from "Chocs" on this forum.

Whilst the banter is rather amusing in revealing yourobsession I will leave it to you to continue with it. Frankly, it is spooky and I will take sensible advice. Your problem not mine.

In the meantime I will move on. Don't you have a real job?

Some of us dont have to work my friend

arniegang wrote:Nice post TJ

Thank you, it sums up my sentiments entirely - alas sadly i dont think it will happen though. There appears to be a level of hate that some people just cant let go of.

I will be quite frank in telling you this in that the level of hate for me is because i never agreed and spoke openly about how he used to treat and speak to Sage. I know both of them well and see both as deep rooted nice people and Sage in particular.

This is why, if you notice, all XPT does is to continually moan and critise "Mods", he is in fact refering to Sage and i.

Whether or not anyone believes otherwise about whether or not XTP is aka Concord aka Ballbreaker aka Ballbreaker2 matters not to me. I know what i know and i am comfortable with that, and i shall continue to address XTP as i see fit.

End of sermon

You’re welcome Arnie…

This is turning out to be a like a who-done-it novel!!!

XPT says he’s not Concord and he does not know you, but you say he is Concord and that you know him personally (as a former friend of yours)!!!

You sounded absolutely positive!! I thought you had solid evidence that XPT is, indeed, Concord. Like, for example, records of IP addresses. Or that he used the same email address when registering for the different 3 user names!!!

But it appears you have based your findings on the similarities in his writing style and the theme of his posts.

The is either a case of mistaken identity, or just a case of clever disguise!!!

Either way.. it’s bad ….because it’s creating a lot of friction and resentment between you guys….which, in turn, is bad for this forum and for everybody.

We had already seen enough fights between Chocs and some others ….. which eventually led to a falling out among other old friends (you know whom I’m talking about)!!!

Well… I guess I will say no more! My rant is over!!

Cheers!

Oh.... one more thing!

If Concord and the two Ballbreakers were not banned, or were banned only temporarily, why would you think that Concord had to resort to using a third user name. Is it because he does not want the world to know who he is, or is because that he suffers from "multiple personality syndrome"???

Tom Jones wrote:Oh.... one more thing!

If Concord and the two Ballbreakers were not banned, or were banned only temporarily, why would you think that Concord had to resort to using a third user name. Is it because he does not want the world to know who he is, or is because that he suffers from "multiple personality syndrome"???

Ballbreaker is banned because of the "poll", Concord and Ballbreaker2 are not banned. Concord also has 4 other alias's only 2 of which i know. So to my knowledge he has 6 current user ID's. The reason why he doesn't use Concord i am guessing, is not to loose face about about his failed forum and he see's using alter usernames as a form of amusment to create the same havoc he always did. When he posted as Concord he used to tell us he had other users and we all thought it was funny, especially when one of his usernames "Mac" was used. Mac used to mimic the terrible English of a good indian friend of ours. We all back then, enjoyed the banter.

All i can say is for a fact is that Ballbreaker, Ballbreaker2 and XPT have all posted from the same IP. I also know for a fact that Ballbreaker was Concord. Draw your own conclusions.

It is difficult to explain when you ask how do i know. All i can say is, that i have known Concord for 5 years. We both posted over 3000 posts as friends and have have met many times. You just know by the way someone writes, including their individual grammatical quirks (we all have and hardly any of us realises) that you know who they are. Sage and I had already worked out Ballbreaker was Concord even before a mutual friend confirmed it.

Like i said previously i am not really bothered whether anyone else can make the same connection and in reality no one else apart from Sage, I and Chocs can. As XPT correctly pointed out no one else here apart from Ian and the 3 of us, knows or has ever communicated with Concord.

Sage and I are satisfied we know who XPT is, and thats good enough for us.

arniegang wrote:

Tom Jones wrote:Oh.... one more thing!

If Concord and the two Ballbreakers were not banned, or were banned only temporarily, why would you think that Concord had to resort to using a third user name. Is it because he does not want the world to know who he is, or is because that he suffers from "multiple personality syndrome"???

Ballbreaker is banned because of the "poll", Concord and Ballbreaker2 are not banned. Concord also has 4 other alias's only 2 of which i know. So to my knowledge he has 6 current user ID's. The reason why he doesn't use Concord i am guessing, is not to loose face about about his failed forum and he see's using alter usernames as a form of amusment to create the same havoc he always did. When he posted as Concord he used to tell us he had other users and we all thought it was funny, especially when one of his usernames "Mac" was used. Mac used to mimic the terrible English of a good indian friend of ours. We all back then, enjoyed the banter.

All i can say is for a fact is that Ballbreaker, Ballbreaker2 and XPT have all posted from the same IP. I also know for a fact that Ballbreaker was Concord. Draw your own conclusions.

It is difficult to explain when you ask how do i know. All i can say is, that i have known Concord for 5 years. We both posted over 3000 posts as friends and have have met many times. You just know by the way someone writes, including their individual grammatical quirks (we all have and hardly any of us realises) that you know who they are. Sage and I had already worked out Ballbreaker was Concord even before a mutual friend confirmed it.

Like i said previously i am not really bothered whether anyone else can make the same connection and in reality no one else apart from Sage, I and Chocs can. As XPT correctly pointed out no one else here apart from Ian and the 3 of us, knows or has ever communicated with Concord.

Sage and I are satisfied we know who XPT is, and thats good enough for us.

Amen

Come on kiddies, play nice.

Bora Bora wrote:

Come on kiddies, play nice.

I am not sure how this advice should be taken from one who can really get DOWN

Sage, all this who is who, who isn't who, blah, blah, blah. I could say that arniegang is really chocs. Or that chocs is really arniegang. Seeing how the two members posts are very similar in style it's a fair conclusion, but I certainly wouldn't swear by it. Preaching one thing and doing another.

Yeah, I can get DOWN as you put it, but I'm not one dimensional. I have several sides to me, and none of them are hypocritical.

lol! yeah sometimes I think Arniegang is chocs too! but Arnie is more polite than chocs!

Bora maybe you are me! and Robbyg is rudeboy! hehehhehe

Bora Bora wrote:Sage, all this who is who, who isn't who, blah, blah, blah. I could say that arniegang is really chocs. Or that chocs is really arniegang. Seeing how the two members posts are very similar in style it's a fair conclusion, but I certainly wouldn't swear by it. Preaching one thing and doing another.

Yeah, I can get DOWN as you put it, but I'm not one dimensional. I have several sides to me, and none of them are hypocritical.

Thanks for the clarification BB

sage & onion wrote:

Bora Bora wrote:Sage, all this who is who, who isn't who, blah, blah, blah. I could say that arniegang is really chocs. Or that chocs is really arniegang. Seeing how the two members posts are very similar in style it's a fair conclusion, but I certainly wouldn't swear by it. Preaching one thing and doing another.

Yeah, I can get DOWN as you put it, but I'm not one dimensional. I have several sides to me, and none of them are hypocritical.

Thanks for the clarification BB

Any time S&O.

I am Mel

I am me

sage & onion wrote:I am me

No no no no, you are me

Bora Bora wrote:Sage, all this who is who, who isn't who, blah, blah, blah. I could say that arniegang is really chocs. Or that chocs is really arniegang. Seeing how the two members posts are very similar in style it's a fair conclusion, but I certainly wouldn't swear by it. Preaching one thing and doing another.

Yeah, I can get DOWN as you put it, but I'm not one dimensional. I have several sides to me, and none of them are hypocritical.

a/ i can spell and puncuate

b/ i dont do hysterical

and ...

c/ i never post in romance

Seriously how could anyone confuse my writing style with Chocs

^^^ohh u do that wrong spelling on purpose to fool us Arnie! hahaha but finally we discovered that you are Chocs!