Dubai Forums Dubai Discussions Dubai General Chat

Personally I find it offensive, disturbing and inappropriate that a moderator posts on a public forum with an avatar of the worst terrorist ever. He should be banned or to the least, limited to fight club.

gertrude wrote:Personally I find it offensive, disturbing and inappropriate that a moderator posts on a public forum with an avatar of the worst terrorist ever. He should be banned or to the least, limited to fight club.

I think that's a bit harsh on Mr Bean.

As for 'worst terrorist ever' - interesting view - by what measure is Bin Laden (I'm assuming you mean him) is the 'worst terrorist ever'? Is it numbers killed, or his stated goals - which is to have foreign troops leave Saudi Arabia etc?

'Ever' is quite a long time.

If you go to the Religion forum you'll find that there are Biblical war crimes where 32,000 virgins were enslaved by Israelites after they massacred all the men, babies, boys etc - so arguably, this act of terrorism is worse than Bin Laden's 'reign of terror'?

(I think he bin laden is a terrorist, though - don't get me wrong - anyone who intentionally murders civilians is)

shafique wrote:[(I think he bin laden is a terrorist, though - don't get me wrong - anyone who intentionally murders civilians is)

Indeed.

gertrude wrote:Personally I find it offensive, disturbing and inappropriate that a moderator posts on a public forum with an avatar of the worst terrorist ever. He should be banned or to the least, limited to fight club.

Lol, Gertrude you really have no idea do you?

sage & onion wrote:

gertrude wrote:Personally I find it offensive, disturbing and inappropriate that a moderator posts on a public forum with an avatar of the worst terrorist ever. He should be banned or to the least, limited to fight club.

Lol, Gertrude you really have no idea do you?

This was a direct admission that he's (pretending) to be Bin Laden.

RobbyG wrote:

sage & onion wrote:

gertrude wrote:Personally I find it offensive, disturbing and inappropriate that a moderator posts on a public forum with an avatar of the worst terrorist ever. He should be banned or to the least, limited to fight club.

Lol, Gertrude you really have no idea do you?

This was a direct admission that he's (pretending) to be Bin Laden.

You are another fool RB, as previously said and proven my Avatar is about Mr. Bean, who by the way is a very funny guy.

Its RG. Geeeeee....

You're welcome

shafique wrote:

gertrude wrote:Personally I find it offensive, disturbing and inappropriate that a moderator posts on a public forum with an avatar of the worst terrorist ever. He should be banned or to the least, limited to fight club.

I think that's a bit harsh on Mr Bean.

As for 'worst terrorist ever' - interesting view - by what measure is Bin Laden (I'm assuming you mean him) is the 'worst terrorist ever'? Is it numbers killed, or his stated goals - which is to have foreign troops leave Saudi Arabia etc?

'Ever' is quite a long time.

If you go to the Religion forum you'll find that there are Biblical war crimes where 32,000 virgins were enslaved by Israelites after they massacred all the men, babies, boys etc - so arguably, this act of terrorism is worse than Bin Laden's 'reign of terror'?

(I think he bin laden is a terrorist, though - don't get me wrong - anyone who intentionally murders civilians is)

Watch ur tongue big boy. With every post you make ur beginning to sound increasingly radical. And pls don't talk crap bout some biblical war crimes, It would be greatly appreciated if you'd live in the present.

Hey, MSL - I've told you a million times that I have a problem with people exagerating!

I was just having a tongue-in-cheek go at the 'worst terrorist ever' statement, and any post that mentions Mr Bean can't be too 'heavy' by definition.

(And, aren't I duty bound to advertise the fun and games we're having down in the Religion forum??)



Cheers,
Shafique

shafique wrote:Hey, MSL - I've told you a million times that I have a problem with people exagerating!

I was just having a tongue-in-cheek go at the 'worst terrorist ever' statement, and any post that mentions Mr Bean can't be too 'heavy' by definition.

(And, aren't I duty bound to advertise the fun and games we're having down in the Religion forum??)



Cheers,
Shafique

Thanks M8, at least someone on here recognizes the projected humor behind my Avatar

sage & onion wrote:
Thanks M8, at least someone on here recognizes the projected humor behind my Avatar

Ahhhww the grown-up Sage almost starts crying here...

Its not your avatar that is losing its credibility. Its the 'man' behind it that gets people thinking. Hence the satire surrounding your Osama avatar.

What a joke you are.

RobbyG wrote:

sage & onion wrote:
Thanks M8, at least someone on here recognizes the projected humor behind my Avatar

Ahhhww the grown-up Sage almost starts crying here...

Its not your avatar that is losing its credibility. Its the 'man' behind it that gets people thinking. Hence the satire surrounding your Osama avatar.

What a joke you are.

You know what RG your just another DB that really does not warrant any further comment.

You trigger those comments with your ing bias. Somebody has to provide some balance on this forum. After all, there's nothing untrue in what I say.

And you know it! but can't stand it! Now thats the difference

RobbyG wrote:You trigger those comments with your ing bias. Somebody has to provide some balance on this forum. After all, there's nothing untrue in what I say.

And you know it! but can't stand it! Now thats the difference

What do you know about true and untrue? when you have never been here. Robby, seriously, you quoting every biased news article that is printed/posted does not make it true.

There is no arguing with you about decent reporting. One can't be credible if you never show a balanced argument about Dubai for instance. What I quote is from respected sources most of the time. Either checked by my own vigorous reading or by independant journalists in the Western media.

I just summarize. You spread your bias. Thats a big difference Sage.

RobbyG wrote:There is no arguing with you about decent reporting. One can't be credible if you never show a balanced argument about Dubai for instance. What I quote is from respected sources most of the time. Either checked by my own vigorous reading or by independant journalists in the Western media.

I just summarize. You spread your bias. Thats a big difference Sage.

Give me an example of "respected source" and I will do my best to show what a load of rubbish they are trying to portray.

What happened to the thread on Dubai World being sued for stealing $3M in a hotel in New York?

sage & onion wrote:
Give me an example of "respected source" and I will do my best to show what a load of rubbish they are trying to portray.

Did you actually read what you wrote?

You already give notice of 'trying to do your best' to debunk information from a respected source, like Bloomberg or Reuters for instance.

There lies the trouble with you. You think you know, but you really don't know. I've showed you that multiple times with my fact based arguments and links.

Lets end this crap. You are infected with Arab ignorance. I'm not the only one who sees that mate. Haven't you noticed?

capsicum wrote:What happened to the thread on Dubai World being sued for stealing $3M in a hotel in New York?

Fight Club. I named him an airplane. A fokker.

RobbyG wrote:

capsicum wrote:What happened to the thread on Dubai World being sued for stealing $3M in a hotel in New York?

Fight Club. I named him an airplane. A fokker.

Oh ok, so for those who missed it, Istithmar of Dubai World is being sued in New York for stealing 3 million dollars.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/s ... WTWIGmPsgN

Well, here we go again

Algeria arrests Mossad agent with fake Spanish passport ...

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1159947.html