Just note that i was talking about the "New middle east" as proposed by the US.
Well, that's not what the OP was talking about. What you're doing then is hijacking the topic.
Well, hijacker then i am!!!! so i was right in mentioning that i didn't read the article, so no harm
it got the same concept of dividing the countries based on ethnic demography, which i find very racist as you divide people based on their race.....
How would you divide people then? As the Europeans did in Africa resulting in ethnic conflicts like in Rwanda, Burundi, Congo, Sudan, etc?.
Why dividing, not uniting??? and these confilcts are not due to different races, it is due to personal greed of powerful people. have some rational, why would anyone kill another because of race, it is only a cover. And i lived in country with different minorities and noone wanted to isolate except very few who got special interest to serve them as individuals, but always the good peple of each minority stop the madness.
I'm from Egypt, and we have Muslims, Christians (yeah yeah, some heat recently but it always ups and downs and it end up peacfully with no problems) we have nubians, arabs (sinai and borders with libya), beduins, southern egyptians (sa'aida), Europeans and americans, Armenians and greeks.
We all live in peace.
[
Like for example i can expect there are more Brits or Indians in UAE than nationals, does this means that we divide the UAE to parts and give the brits part and the indians another part?????
Expat residents are not the same as citizens so your analogy is irrelevant. .
Well in dubai there as be the so called "expat residents" here for longer than you have been in your own country, so they have rights too. and if the papers (passports and nationality) is what counts to you... then yes it is irrelevant
[
well,, you said it, but as years move by each country got its identity and its minorities, but all have aligence ... or loyality to their flag and nation, so it is irrelevant to devide by race or religion or it will be another small Israels that is a country based on Race, or religion.
It's very relevant since so many current conflicts seem to be based on race and/or religion.
And the basis for the USA or Australia, which are countries built by immigrants would be considered as "BAD" and they have to be divided.
You appear to be ignoring Aborigines and American Indians..
no you did, chekc my previous post when i said then Red Indians should rule the states as they are the original citizens.
I don't know which country you are from
Why is that important?.
why are you ashamed of your country?? important to know your background and understand the retional behind your conversation.
[
but i wouldn't like see it happening in my country, it was proposed several times, but thank god and the people opposed it that it failed.
Then I guess you have no sympathy for Kurdish, or Aborigine, or an Albanian in Kosovo, or Darfurian, or Chechen, or Tibetan, or Palestinian, or Basque, or one of a number of people without a country they want to call their own.
My country don't have all this variation. Then after dividing by race, divide by religion, then divide by political belife..... what is this... why countries are for???? Do you want humanity to go back as tribes, and every person stick to his clan???
i do disagree, and i have this right