Lionheart, coaltion military personnel do not target women and children. They target men who are involved in insurgent activities. Both insurgents and coalition forces have killed women and children because they happened to be in the line of fire.
You cannot say for sure that Muslim men wouldn't rape female coalition soldiers. It seems to me that there are Muslim men think that Western women are so loose and deserve s.e.xual abuse. Look at the group of Emirati men who kidnapped and raped the British flight attendant. In Finland there was a group of Somali guys who dragged a woman off and raped her in a park while her baby sat in its carriage. I can get propositioned in Dubai just by waiting for a taxi on the street after a doctor's appointment in the middle of the day! Being Muslim doesn't deter these men from engaging in horrific behaviour. How do you know there aren't some insurgents who want revenge for Iraqi women killed and abused? Do you suddenly speak for all insurgents and can you vouch for their character?
You know what, I can vouch for insurgents' lack of character. There is no honour in destabilising a country - it is bad enough that coalition forces went in in the first place. Who are the insurgents to say that everyday Iraqis who volunteer for a police force are "puppets" who deserve to be blown up? Many of the insurgents aren't Iraqi and they seem to have their own agenda. What makes them any different that coalition forces who aren't Iraqi and are pushing forward their own agenda? Let me guessLionheart.[/,bThe fact that you even justify insurgents' behaviour is a disgrace quote]
Lionheart, coaltion military personnel do not target women and children. They target men who are involved in insurgent activities. Both insurgents and coalition forces have killed women and children because they happened to be in the line of fire.
Like said before American soliders have no feeling or connection to Iraqis, when they drop bombs over Bagdad they celebrate like they are playing video game, Iraqi lifes like the lifes of Vietcongs is not worth anything to American GI who has been programed to hate, kill, rape his enemy. American soliders feeling toward Iraqis is the same way Bin Laden gang feels toward Americans.
You cannot say for sure that Muslim men wouldn't rape female coalition soldiers. It seems to me that there are Muslim men think that Western women are so loose and deserve s.e.xual abuse. Look at the group of Emirati men who kidnapped and raped the British flight attendant. In Finland there was a group of Somali guys who dragged a woman off and raped her in a park while her baby sat in its carriage. I can get propositioned in Dubai just by waiting for a taxi on the street after a doctor's appointment in the middle of the day! Being Muslim doesn't deter these men from engaging in horrific behaviour. How do you know there aren't some insurgents who want revenge for Iraqi women killed and abused? Do you suddenly speak for all insurgents and can you vouch for their character?
We went from talking about Iraqi insurgents conduct and Occuppiers conduct, to muslims around the world raping Western woman. What does horny spoiled Emirate raping Western Flight attender or horny Somali thugs raping Finnish girl have to do with Iraqi Insurgents who havent raped any of their female hostages, unlike American who raped the female Iraqi hostages they captured. Muslim man are human and are capable of rape, but in Iraqi and in Afghanisgtan there has not been a case were female hostage has been raped. For example the taliban who the west sees as the most abusive regime toward woman captured the English female journalist Ridley just a week before the bombing in Afghanistan started... The Taliban could have raped her beaten her like Americans, but they didn't anything to her...For a month or two she was their hostage... no Taliban or any other Afghan tried to rape her.
It was okey for Mujihadeens from Indonesia, Pakistan, Morroco, Algeria, Senegal, Ethiopia, Yemen, Saud Arabia, Syria, Etc to go to Afghanistan to fight against Russian occuppation in Afghanistan...But Today its not okey for Syrians, Jordanian and Saudis to fight alongside their tribal brothers in Western Iraq.
What makes the Jordanians, Syrians and Saudis fighting Iraq different from the coalition force is that the coalition force crossed a whole ocean to invade Iraq for its mineral riches and the protection of Isreal not Iraqis. The Jordanians/Syrians/Saudis most came to Iraq to aid their tribal brothers who have been invaded by foriegn enemies....but there are also some who came to Iraq for more sinister motivations.
Why do I justify or support the actions of the insurgent groups?
I don't justify all the action committed by the insurgents... example I'm against bombs near any populated..even if the target is police or the army.... I'm against the beheadings and kidnapping of foriegn journalist...even if they work for Fox or CNN...
I support the insurgents because they are fighting for a just cause...they are fighting against a foriegn enemies determined to install people they can controll and manupulate. I don't think the British/ American people would tolerate another country invading their land and install puppets who serve the interest of the invaders. I think just like the insurgents in Iraq the American and British people would fight to liberate their land... Of course the invaders would call them terrorists, thugs, etc..anything to discredit them in the eyes of their people and people around the world.